Meat and Deli Retailer
  Home
  Subscribe
  Online
  Meat Case Strategies
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Departments
  New Products
  Ad Index
  Resources
  Archives
  Retailer Profiles
  Research
  Classified Ads
  Calendar of Events
  MDR Info
  About Us
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  Reprints
  List Rental
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
The Branding Influence
by Richard Mitchell
June 4, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Branded meats are essential tools for attracting customers to specific retail outlets.

That is among the key findings of the recent Power of Brands report, which gages the role of brands in meat selections and purchases. .

The conclusion is based on an online survey that was conducted last December with 600 adults who had bought beef, pork or chicken in the previous month. .

The study found that 27 percent of respondents strongly agree that they often choose their stores in accordance with the available meat brands. .

In addition, 74 percent of the consumers, who are the primary food shoppers and meal preparers in their households, noted that brands play some role in where they shop. .

“This shows the opportunity retailers have in getting meat purchasers to become loyal customers,” says Michael Uetz, principal with Midan Marketing, a Chicago-based marketing, market research and communications firm. “Perishables rule the supermarket and meat is a huge draw. Retailers need to make sure it stays that way by rising above the crowd and having shoppers determine their brands.” .

The survey of consumers in Chicago, Dallas, Denver and Philadelphia by Midan Marketing and Bethesda, Md.-based Shugoll Research also reveals a strong allegiance to national brands. .

Seventy percent of respondents noted that they prefer national brands for chicken, while 52 percent and 43 percent do so for pork and beef, respectively.“Beef was the last category to leverage branding programs,” Uetz says. “We now are seeing more partnerships between retailers and beef suppliers and the launch of additional private-label beef products.”Twenty percent of beef purchasers favor store brands, compared to nine percent of shoppers overall, the study states.In addition, 35 percent of pork buyers noted that they have no brand preference. And just 4 percent and 3 percent of consumers, respectively, said they favor private-label pork and chicken.


“The low recognition of pork brands creates a large opportunity for retailers to achieve great success with their private-label products,” Uetz says.

Price, meanwhile, remains a major factor in purchase decisions, the study found. The respondents, on average, perceived the price difference between branded and unbranded meats to be $2.40, and indicated that they are only willing to pay an additional $1.60 for branded proteins. Of those willing to pay more, 84 percent noted they would accept a 5-percent premium; 76 percent indicated they would pay 10-percent more; and 55 percent noted they would pay an additional 20 percent.

“Price is always the top of mind for customers,” Uetz says. “If the price goes up, they will buy less. But a strong brand can help retailers overcome that barrier.”

Cost also is perceived at the most significant differentiator between branded and unbranded proteins, the study reports. Among the 37 percent of consumers who stated that they believe branded meats vary greatly from unbranded, 56 percent cited price as the greatest variable. It is followed by value, quality, tenderness, freshness, consistency and healthfulness. It is important for merchandisers to stress such attributes in their marketing, particularly because many shoppers cannot easily recall brands. Indeed, the survey reveals that only 42 percent of consumers could name a specific meat brand.

Just one brand, on average, was mentioned on an unaided basis. Spontaneous recall of chicken brands was highest, followed by beef and pork. Consumers could recall an average of 4.8 meat brands when asked about particular products, the study reports. Aided recall was highest for beef and chicken and significantly less for pork.

Uetz says the biggest surprise from the research was the inability of many respondents to name a single beef or pork brand. Yet, because most retailers market national poultry brands, merchandisers are more likely to differentiate their offerings with private-label beef and pork, he notes.

“With enhanced marketing of specific brands, retailers have a large opportunity to stand out in the crowd,” Uetz says. “It is important in a competitive environment to do anything to get a brand to top of mind.” It is not sufficient, however,  for merchandisers to merely offer branded meats with little advertising and in-store marketing support, the study reports.

“Simply applying and sticking to the principles of marketing—product, placement, position and promotion—in a way the consistently conveys the value proposition to the target audience has the opportunity to greatly increase a brand’s awareness and increase loyalty,” the study notes. Co-marketing by retailers and meat companies also can strengthen customer loyalty to brands, the report states.

 “There is considerable room for marketers to build awareness of product qualities and thereby improve the perceived value proposition of these products to consumers,” the study concludes. “This will, in turn, increase the price premium consumers are willing to pay for branded products.”


Richard Mitchell
mitchellr@bnpmedia.com


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



BNP Media
© 2007 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy